Monday, December 25, 2006

How can they make a movie for this and not make a movie for Xena

On my November 3 post about why there is no Xena movie, I lay it out in pretty simple terms as to why there has not been movie and probably won't be a movie.

The fact that Xena "reportedly" made Universal (then MCA then Universal then Studios USA) millions of dollars is a moot point. We, the fans, don't know how much Universal (etc) made off of the series. It could be that they just broke even, were always in the red, or did make money. But just because Xena was the top rated syndicated series for several years does not guarantee a movie is in the works or even deserves to be made.

I refer you to my previous comment from the November 3rd post:

Studios do market research to see what a movie will make at the box office
(domestically, meaning inside of the United States). They analyze genre, talent
pool, story, etc, etc and if the market is not warm to it, that hurts the bottom
line of the budget. If a particular movie doesn't look like it'll fair well at
theater, it'll significantly impact the budget (or lack of) offered to a
particular film.

So, I say again, it's about marketing and genre.

2 comments:

  1. there's an "x factor," though, if you will. it's in marketing as it is in politics. there are things that no amount of polling or market research can capture or quantify. if 10,000 die hard xena fans call in 100 times for lucy lawless on celebrity duets, that's a million calls. and i know i called way more than that. i think if there were a movie, the fans would behave in a way that market research simply couldn't predict.

    all of this is not to say that a movie will get made. it probably won't, sadly! but i sure do wish they would take the risk... :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're forgetting the general audience. The 'browncoats' may have showed up for the "Serenity" movie, but the general audience stayed away. It's called the "unknown factor." (And you all figure that one out.)

    And "Serenity" didn't even break even. Hmm...

    ReplyDelete